Independence of Women in Marriage in the Medieval Era Essay

Independence of Women in Marriage in the Medieval date of reference - Essay ExampleFurthermore, since a man writes her prologue, we cannot help but think closely why he wrote it. This imaginary character gives Chaucer a chance to utter several subjects that might have been forbidden during his time. By making use of irony and wittiness, Chaucer is able to construct narrations regarding women and how they are dealt with. It is ought to be noted that Chaucer was definitely seeking to embody a womans voice. Actually, by creating the Wife of Bath, we can presume he wanted to produce a memorable personality in her.In her Prologue as part of The Canterbury Tales by Geoffrey Chaucer, The Wife of Bath offers readers a complex portrait of a medieval woman. On the one hand, The Wife of Bath is shameless about her sexual exploits and the way she uses sexual power to obtain what she wishes. Alternatively, by doing precisely these things she is bearing out unconstructive stereotypes regarding women and showing that women are manipulative and deceiving. Although her performances might at first appear to be uprising against the male-dominated culture in The Canterbury Tales, and more commonly, the medieval era for women, there is very slight that she does that is in fact subverter or making powerful women of her time.Based even just on her introduction in The Canterbury Ta... be seen as a parody of sorts since she embodies a bit of negative female characteristics including stupidity and arrogance deceitfulness, and lewdness. Although she is striking back at men it is not for any deeper reason other than personal profit. It appears that in this share of the prologue to the Wife of Baths tale, Chaucer wants his readers to laugh at this character rather than admire her for her proto-feminist stances on life and marriage.If the wife character in the Wife of Bath is meant to destroy the articulate of women, one could visualize that she would employ in intellectual and infor med discussion with some of the constituents of her party. As it positions, however, the nearest she comes to this is by presenting her twisted consideration of the Bible. Rather conceitedly she declares in one of the significant quotes from The Canterbury Tales (and The Wife of Baths Tale particularly), Men may divine and glosen up and down / But well woot I express withouten deception / God bad us for to wexe and multiplye / That gentil text can I wel understone (lines 26-30). While it can be found in the Bible that humans should procreate, it is worth noting that she prefaces this statement with a few intelligence operations about how men sit and interpret the Bible. In her Prologue in the Canterbury Tales by Chaucer, the Wife of Bath is claiming that she too is capable of doing this and that the text is not beyond her reach. Yet, the setback with this is that she is not confirming anything about her cleverness she is simply trying to prove or defend her loose actions along wi th the word of God. The Wifes symbolic techniques, however unscrupulous, achieve the desired results. The spectators cannot present instantaneous counter-arguments, and if we visualize her in the dramatic condition